Cervical dystonia (CD) is a neurological movement disorder characterized by involuntary muscle contractions causing abnormal postures and/or twisting movements of the head and neck.Patients may also experience non-motor symptoms including pain, anxiety and depression. The main treatment option is botulinum toxin (BoNT) injections in affected muscles to improve head postures and reduce pain. In addition to BoNT treatment, patients are often referred for physical therapy (PT), but there is little evidence regarding the long-term effectiveness.Despite remarkable improvements during the last decades, there are still many unmet needs that remain open in the treatment of cervical dystonia (CD). The first goal of this thesis was to assess clinical issues in BoNT treatment that need further improvement and to define clinical recommendations for clinicians. The second goal was to explore which determinants play an important role in disability of CD patients and the third goal was to develop a specialized PT program and to evaluate its effects on disability.Results showed that BoNT treatment can be further improved despite all the evidence for its effectiveness. Further research is needed towards optimal treatment intervals, dose equivalence between different BoNT formulations, the use of supportive techniques like electromyography or ultrasound and managing side effects. Secondly, we found that psychological factors are important determinants of disability. Finally, we found that PT is a valuable addition to BoNT treatment to improve disability and pain. Based on these findings, a multidisciplinary treatment approach to further improve the treatment and quality of life for CD patients is recommended.
Background: Acne vulgaris is a multifaceted skin disorder, affecting more than 85% of young individuals worldwide. Pharmacological therapy is not always desirable because of the development of antibiotic resistance or the potential risk of adverse effects. Non‐pharmacological therapies can be viable alternatives for conventional therapies. However, sufficient evidence‐based support in the efficacy and safety of non‐pharmacological therapies is lacking. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of several non‐pharmacological therapies in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Methods: A systematic literature review, including a best‐evidence synthesis, was performed to identify literature. Three electronic databases were accessed and searched for studies published between January 2000 and May 2017. Results: Thirty‐three eligible studies were included in our systematic review. Three main types of non‐pharmacological therapies were identified laser‐ and light‐based therapies, chemical peels and fractional microneedling radiofrequency. The majority of the included studies demonstrated a significant reduction in acne lesions. However, only seven studies had a high methodologic quality. Based on these seven trials, a best‐evidence synthesis was conducted. Strong evidence was found for glycolic acid (10–40%). Moderate evidence was found for amino fruit acid (20–60%), intense pulsed light (400–700 and 870–1200 nm) and the diode laser (1450 nm). Initially, conflicting evidence was found for pulsed dye laser (585–595 nm). The most frequently reported side‐effects for non‐pharmacological therapies included erythema, tolerable pain, purpura, oedema and a few cases of hyperpigmentation, which were in most cases mild and transient. Conclusion: Circumstantial evidence was found for non‐pharmacological therapies in the treatment of acne vulgaris. However, the lack of high methodological quality among included studies prevented us to draw clear conclusions, regarding a stepwise approach. Nevertheless, our systematic review including a best‐evidence synthesis did create order and structure in resulting outcomes in which a first step towards future research is generated.
