Background Running-related injuries (RRIs) can be considered the primary enemy of runners. Most literature on injury prediction and prevention overlooks the mental aspects of overtraining and under-recovery, despite their potential role in injury prediction and prevention. Consequently, knowledge on the role of mental aspects in RRIs is lacking. Objective To investigate mental aspects of overtraining and under-recovery by means of an online injury prevention programme. Methods and analysis The ‘Take a Mental Break!’ study is a randomised controlled trial with a 12 month follow-up. After completing a web-based baseline survey, half and full marathon runners were randomly assigned to the intervention group or the control group. Participants of the intervention group obtained access to an online injury prevention programme, consisting of a running-related smartphone application. This app provided the participants of the intervention group with information on how to prevent overtraining and RRIs with special attention to mental aspects. The primary outcome measure is any self-reported RRI over the past 12 months. Secondary outcome measures include vigour, fatigue, sleep and perceived running performance. Regression analysis will be conducted to investigate whether the injury prevention programme has led to a lower prevalence of RRIs, better health and improved perceived running performance. Ethics and dissemination The Medical Ethics Committee of the University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands, has exempted the current study from ethical approval (reference number: NL64342.041.17). Results of the study will be communicated through scientific articles in peer-reviewed journals, scientific reports and presentations on scientific conferences.
DOCUMENT
Living labs are complex multi-stakeholder collaborations that often employ a usercentred and design-driven methodology to foster innovation. Conventional management tools fall short in evaluating them. However, some methods and tools dedicated to living labs' special characteristics and goals have already been developed. Most of them are still in their testing phase. Those tools are not easily accessible and can only be found in extensive research reports, which are difficult to dissect. Therefore, this paper reviews seven evaluation methods and tools specially developed for living labs. Each section of this paper is structured in the following manner: tool’s introduction (1), who uses the tool (2), and how it should be used (3). While the first set of tools, namely “ENoLL 20 Indicators”, “SISCODE Self-assessment”, and “SCIROCCO Exchange Tool” assess a living lab as an organisation and are diving deeper into the organisational activities and the complex context, the second set of methods and tools, “FormIT” and “Living Lab Markers”, evaluate living labs’ methodologies: the process they use to come to innovations. The paper's final section presents “CheRRIes Monitoring and Evaluation Tool” and “TALIA Indicator for Benchmarking Service for Regions”, which assess the regional impact made by living labs. As every living lab is different regarding its maturity (as an organisation and in its methodology) and the scope of impact it wants to make, the most crucial decision when evaluating is to determine the focus of the assessment. This overview allows for a first orientation on worked-out methods and on possible indicators to use. It also concludes that the existing tools are quite managerial in their method and aesthetics and calls for designers and social scientists to develop more playful, engaging and (possibly) learning-oriented tools to evaluate living labs in the future. LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/overdiek12345/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/mari-genova-17a727196/?originalSubdomain=nl
DOCUMENT
This paper is a case report of why and how CDIO became a shared framework for Community Service Engineering (CSE) education. CSE can be defined as the engineering of products, product-service combinations or services that fulfill well-being and health needs in the social domain, specifically for vulnerable groups in society. The vulnerable groups in society are growing, while fewer people work in health care. Finding technical, interdisciplinary solutions for their unmet needs is the territory of the Community Service Engineer. These unmet needs arise in local niche markets as well as in the global community, which makes it an interesting area for innovation and collaboration in an international setting. Therefore, five universities from Belgium, Portugal, the Netherlands, and Sweden decided to work together as hubs in local innovation networks to create international innovation power. The aim of the project is to develop education on undergraduate, graduate and post-graduate levels. The partners are not aiming at a joined degree or diploma, but offer a shared short track blended course (3EC), which each partner can supplement with their own courses or projects (up to 30EC). The blended curriculum in CSE is based on design thinking principles. Resources are shared and collaboration between students and staff is organized at different levels. CDIO was chosen as the common framework and the syllabus 2.0 was used as a blueprint for the CSE learning goals in each university. CSE projects are characterized by an interdisciplinary, human centered approach leading to inter-faculty collaboration. At the university of Porto, EUR-ACE was already used as the engineering education framework, so a translation table was used to facilitate common development. Even though Thomas More and KU Leuven are no CDIO partner, their choice for design thinking as the leading method in the post-Masters pilot course insured a good fit with the CDIO syllabus. At this point University West is applying for CDIO and they are yet to discover what the adaptation means for their programs and their emerging CSE initiatives. CDIO proved to fit well to in the authentic open innovation network context in which engineering students actively do CSE projects. CDIO became the common language and means to continuously improve the quality of the CSE curriculum.
DOCUMENT
Uit cijfers van het CBS zien we dat de vraag naar biologische producten achterblijft. De meerprijs die consumenten moeten neerleggen voor biologische productalternatieven blijkt een belangrijke belemmering te zijn voor de overstap naar biologisch. Hoe kunnen we deze gepercipieerde prijsbarrière bij de consument overkomen?
De aanvraag betreft het ontwikkelen en verkennen van de marktmogelijkheden van een IT-tool dat de slaagkans van bedrijfsoverdrachten verbetert. De (emotionele) barrières die ondernemers bij de verkoop hun bedrijf tegenko-men worden inzichtelijk gemaakt. Tevens wordt getoetst of de manier waarop ondernemers nu omgaan met die barrières (coping) effectief is. De doelgroep voor het onderzoek zijn overname-adviseurs, kopende en verkopende ondernemers alsmede investeerders.
Bedrijfsovername is een grote uitdaging voor agrarische familiebedrijven, waarbij het sociaal-emotioneel welzijn van de familie is geïdentificeerd als een belangrijk knelpunt. Vanuit het Nederlands Agrarisch Jongeren Kontakt (NAJK) en het Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit (LNV) is in 2019 het beleidsprogramma Duurzame Bedrijfsopvolging gestart om het aantal succesvolle bedrijfsoverdrachten te verhogen. Een belangrijk onderdeel hiervan is een op te richten Kenniscentrum. Dit project wil het Kenniscentrum voeden met onderzoek naar de familiale dimensie van bedrijfsopvolging. Het praktijkonderzoek wordt uitgevoerd door een consortium bestaande uit het Lectoraat Familiebedrijven van Hogeschool Windesheim, Aeres Hogeschool Dronten, Van Hall Larenstein Leeuwarden, het Fries Sociaal Planbureau, het NAJK en LTO Noord. Doel van dit project is het inventariseren en evalueren van de ondersteunende advies- en kennisinfrastructuur op de familiale dimensie bij het opvolgingstraject van agrarische familiebedrijven. Dit doen we door inzichten op te halen bij zestien agrarische bedrijfsfamilies, in verschillende stadia van het opvolgingsproces. In het project vergelijken we hoe de families en de ondersteunende advies- en kennispartijen omgaan met de belangen en behoeften van verschillende familieleden (opvolgers, overdragers, partners en niet-opvolgers) tijdens het opvolgingsproces. Daarnaast wordt kwantitatief onderzoek gedaan onder studenten op de twee deelnemende agrarische hogescholen, om de behoeften en verwachtingen van potentiële opvolgers en niet-opvolgers ten aanzien van bedrijfsoverdracht in kaart te brengen. Het project moet resulteren in gevalideerde verbetervoorstellen (stappenplannen) voor zowel agrarische bedrijfsfamilies als adviseurs gericht op de verschillende stadia van bedrijfsopvolging. Ook worden spelvormen ontwikkeld om moeilijke en relationeel ingewikkelde onderwerpen beter bespreekbaar te maken in het agrarisch onderwijs. Tot slot worden de resultaten van het onderzoek geschikt gemaakt voor gebruik binnen agrarische scholen om het curriculum over de zachte kant van bedrijfsopvolging te versterken.
Centre of Expertise, part of Hogeschool Van Hall Larenstein, HAS green academy, Aeres Hogeschool
